Search for: "Smith v. California Department of Corrections et al" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
BILL McCOLLUM, ET AL., Respondents. ____________________________/ PETITIONER'S THIRD EMERGENCY MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION TO GET THE FACTS REGARDING DOC MEMORANDA THE PETITIONER, IAN DECO LIGHTBOURNE, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby requests that this Court grant this emergency request to relinquish jurisdiction to a neutral tribunal in the circuit court to get the facts and for full evidentiary development regarding Department of … [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Smith, Commissioner, Florida Department of Education, et al. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
Dept. of Correction, Westville Control Unit, et al (NFP) - "Appellant-plaintiff Eric D. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am by Richard Hunt
WPG, Inc. et al, 3:15-CV-444, 2018 WL 2763453 (S.D. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Maersk (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court S D Texas: Continuing use of accused products sold prior to notice of patent is not direct infringement sufficient to support claim of indirect infringement: Tesco v Weatherford (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Enhanced damages & attorney’s fees: Plaintiff awarded $5 million in fees, $3 million in expert expenses, and treble damages as a result of litigation misconduct by defendant: ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
The first is from the California Attorney General in Rupp v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]